<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Benjamin Gravesteijn</title>
    <link>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/</link>
    <description>Recent content on Benjamin Gravesteijn</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Research highlight: Cost effectiveness of ECPR</title>
      <link>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/10/10/research-highlight-cost-effectiveness-of-ecpr/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/10/10/research-highlight-cost-effectiveness-of-ecpr/</guid>
      <description>The first official post in the series of research highlight will be a paper that I recently published in the journal “Resuscitation”. The title of the study is “Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation after in-hospital cardiac arrest: A Markov decision model”, which is a lengthy, sophisticated, complex, and incomprehensible title, as research should be. Let’s break down what it is about, why we did this study, so we could have a chat about it some time.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Research highlight: introduction</title>
      <link>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/10/09/research-highlight-introduction/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/10/09/research-highlight-introduction/</guid>
      <description>This blogpost is the first in a series, called “Research Highlights”. This is a series where I will put my research into context, contemplate on what I did, and why, and most of all: comprehensible for everybody. I have been thinking about this since only recently, and I would like to share some thoughts on why this feels like the appropriate thing to do.
Most of you probably know that one of the perks of being a PhD student, is to write and publish papers.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>TBI, beer, and chocolates in Leuven</title>
      <link>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/09/12/tbi-beer-and-chocolates-in-leuven/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/09/12/tbi-beer-and-chocolates-in-leuven/</guid>
      <description>Starting of #icpic2019 - listening to the most important viewpoint- that of the patient pic.twitter.com/FU8J5fWpBp
&amp;mdash; David Menon (@Menon_Cambridge) September 8, 2019  For the last month, I have been staying in Cambridge, as you perhaps have read before. However, last week was a little different. I have been flying quite a lot this year: Japan, Vienna, Cambridge, Milan… But my final trip of 2019 commenced last week: a conference in the former beer capitol of the world, Leuven.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Research visit to Cambridge</title>
      <link>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/08/21/research-visit-to-cambridge/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/08/21/research-visit-to-cambridge/</guid>
      <description>The last couple of weeks, I am working in Cambridge. I’m working here with Ari Ercole, and David Menon. Moving to a city where you don’t know anybody can be quite scary. Will you find enough distraction, or will I bore myself to death? Will I drown myself with work, just to keep myself busy? Or will I find a balance?
Deep learning My main focus while I’m here is to develop a deep learning algorithm to predict how patients will be treated the next day, based on how they have been treated.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Writer&#39;s visit to Milan</title>
      <link>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/07/09/writer-s-visit-to-milan/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/07/09/writer-s-visit-to-milan/</guid>
      <description>“Retire me to my Milan, where every third thought shall be my grave.” William Shakespeare
Visiting Milan to write a paper at the Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano: sounds like the most inspiring place to write, right? I know a professor who likes to come here for a week to write books, or funding applications. But now it’s my turn to be inspired by the city of fashion, the most cultivated and wealthiest city of Italy: the country of love.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Multiple imputation</title>
      <link>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/06/06/multiple-imputation/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/06/06/multiple-imputation/</guid>
      <description>This is the tutorial for the paper “Missing data in TBI research: A five step approach for multiple imputation”.
Step 1 - Exploration For the quantity and patterns of missingness VIM::aggr(dti) For the correlation between variables corr &amp;lt;- cor(sapply(dti, as.numeric), use = &amp;quot;pairwise.complete.obs&amp;quot;, method = &amp;quot;spearman&amp;quot;) corrplot::corrplot(corr, type = &amp;quot;lower&amp;quot;)  For overall distributions and % missingess # The first time: # library(devtools) # install_github(&amp;quot;bgravesteijn/bgravesteijn&amp;quot;) bgravesteijn::distr.na(dti)   To test MAR summary(glm(I(is.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Anaesthesia meets Vienna</title>
      <link>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/06/04/euroanesthesia-2019/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/06/04/euroanesthesia-2019/</guid>
      <description>Mentally, I started preparing for this business trip in Tokyo, Japan. After making my way over to the national art center, I was notified that one of the new exhibitions was “Vienna on her way to Modernism”. Through paintings, decorations, and fasion of the fin-de-siècle Viennese art scene, the transformation of Vienna on its way to the 20th century was meticulously displayed. From “just” a European city, to the capitol of the continent, through the development of intensive instrastructure, avant-garde architecture, and of course, the flourishing culture, centered around the Viennese bourgoisie.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>About</title>
      <link>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/about/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 21:48:51 -1051</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/about/</guid>
      <description>This is the website of Benjamin Gravesteijn. He is a PhD student at the department of Public Health, at the Erasmus MC. He works in the section for Medical decision making. His PhD is about data-driven improvement of decision making in acute care.
E-mail: b.gravesteijn@erasmusmc.nl</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Acknowledging and recognizing scientists</title>
      <link>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/05/25/acknowledging-and-recognizing-scientists/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/05/25/acknowledging-and-recognizing-scientists/</guid>
      <description>A recent post focused around the future of acknowledging and recognizing science. One of the main points was that researchers right now are mostly acknowledged on their scientific output, instead of also on their total work as academic. As an illustration, I want to present how the community right now in practice values me as a researcher, as well as how I want to be valued.
Current acknowledgment Researchers right now are acknowledged based on their scientific output: publications.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Evolution or revolution</title>
      <link>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/05/24/evolution-or-revolution/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://bgravesteijn.netlify.com/2019/05/24/evolution-or-revolution/</guid>
      <description>Kunnen de impactfactoren voor de kwaliteit van wetenschap op de schop? Van H-index en Journal Impact Factor naar narratieven en relevantie. Discussier mee via #wetenschapper2030 https://t.co/09GzV6eqOp @IngeborgMeijer pic.twitter.com/NSYS03nKNV
&amp;mdash; ZonMw (@ZonMw) May 20, 2019  Yesterday, I attended a meeting organized by the main Dutch funding organizations ZonMW and the NWO, called “Evolution or Revolution”, together with Daphne Voormolen. The aim of the meeting was to have an open discussion.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>